Россия
Россия
Россия
Россия
Россия
При чрескожных коронарных вмешательствах используются различные варианты лечения пациентов с ишемической болезнью сердца. Основным методом является радиальный доступ благодаря его преимуществам, по сравнению с другими, в снижении осложнений и смертности. В статье анализируется экономическая эффективность радиального доступа при чрескожных коронарных вмешательствах в федеральных округах Российской Федерации.
лучевой доступ, осложнения, окклюзия лучевой артерии, ишемическая болезнь сердца, чрескожное коронарное вмешательство, моделирование, экономический анализ, клинико-экономический анализ, анализ технологий здравоохранения
1. Клинические рекомендации. Острый коронарный синдром без подъема сегмента ST электрокардиограммы. – 2020 Министерство здравоохранения Российской Федерации. https: //cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/schema/154_3
2. Byrne R.A., Rossello X., Coughlan J.J., Barbato E., Berry C., Chieffo A., Claeys M.J., Dan G.A., Dweck M.R., Galbraith M., Gilard M., Hinterbuchner L., Jankowska E.A., Jüni P., Kimura T., Kunadian V., Leosdottir M., Lorusso R., Pedretti R.F.E., Rigopoulos A.G., Rubini Gimenez M., Thiele H., Vranckx P., Wassmann S., Wenger N.K., Ibanez B. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes // Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. – 2024 Feb 9; 13(1):55-161. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjacc/zuad107
3. Kolkailah A.A., Alreshq R.S., Muhammed A.M., Zahran M.E., Anas El-Wegoud M., Nabhan A.F. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with coronary artery disease // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. – 2018; 4:Cd012318.
4. Lefkovits J., Brennan A., Dinh D.T. et al. The Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry Annual Report 2018 // Monash University, SPHPM. August 2018, Report N 6
5. Brooks M., Ellis C., Gamble G. et al. A comparison of radial and femoral coronary angiography in patients from SNAPSHOT ACS, a prospective acute coronary syndrome audit in Australia and New Zealand // Heart Lung Circ. – 2017; 26:258-267.
6. Mamas M.A., Tosh J., Hulme W. et al. Health economic analysis of access site practice in england during changes in practice: insights from the british cardiovascular interventional society // Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. – 2018; 11:e004482.
7. Asrar Ul Haq M, Tsay IM, Dinh DT, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of trans-radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice // Int J Cardiol. – 2016; 221:264–268.
8. Kolkailah A.A., Alreshq R.S., Muhammed A.M., Zahran M.E., Anas El-Wegoud M., Nabhan A.F. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with coronary artery disease // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. – 2018; 4:Cd012318.
9. Mamas M.A., Tosh J., Hulme W. et al. Health economic analysis of access site practice in england during changes in practice: insights from the british cardiovascular interventional society // Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. – 2018; 11:e004482.
10. Lee P., Liew D., Brennan A. et al. Cost-effectiveness of radial access percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome // Am J Cardiol. – 2021; 156:44–51.
11. Lefkovits J., Brennan A., Dinh D.T. et al. The Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry Annual Report 2018 Monash University, SPHPM August 2018, Report N 6
12. Ognerubov D.V., Sedaghat A., Provatorov S.I., Tereshchenko A.S., Bertrand O.F., Bernat I., Arutyunyan G.K., Pogorelova O.A., Tripoten M.I., Balakhonova. T.V. et al. A Randomized Trial Comparing Short versus Prolonged Hemostasis with Rescue Recanalization by Ipsilateral Ulnar Artery Compression: Impact on Radial Artery Occlusion – The RESCUE-RAO Trial // J. Interv. Cardiol. – 2020; 2020: 7928961 Doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7928961
13. Stub D., Lefkovits J., Brennan A.L. et al. The establishment of the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR): monitoring and optimising outcomes for cardiac patients in Victoria // Heart Lung Circ. – 2018; 27:451–463.
14. Lefkovits J., Brennan A., Dinh D.T. et al. 2017 The Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry Annual Report // Monash University, SPHPM August 2018, Report N 5
15. Kwok C.S., Shah B., Al-Suwaidi J., Fischman D.L., Holmvang L., Alraies C., Bagur R., Nagaraja V., Rashid M., Mohamed M., Martin G.P., Kontopantelis E., Kinnaird T., Mamas M. Timing and Causes of Unplanned Readmissions After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Nationwide Readmission Database / JACC Cardiovasc nterv. – 2019 Apr 22; 12(8):734-748. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.007
16. Алекян Б.Г., Григорьян А.М., Стаферов А.В., Карапетян Н.Г. Рентгенэндоваскулярная диагностика и лечение заболеваний сердца и сосудов в Российской Федерации – 2021 год // Эндоваскулярная хирургия. – 2022; 9 (Специальный выпуск): S5–S254. Doi:https://doi.org/10.24183/2409-4080- 2022-9S-S5-S254
17. Россия – ВВП на душу населения. [https: //ru.tradingeconomics.com/russia/gdp-per-capita. Дата обращения 17.05.2024.
18. Ocsan R.J., Doost A., Marley P., Farshid A. The rise of transradial artery access for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes in Australia // J Interv Cardiol. – 2020; 2020:4397697.
19. Lee P, Liew D, Brennan A. et al. Cost-effectiveness of radial access percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome // Am J Cardiol. – 2021; 156:44–51.
20. Jin C., Li W., Qiao S.B. et al. Costs and benefits associated with transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in China // J Am Heart Assoc. – 2016; 5:e002684.
21. Campelo-Parada F., Carrié D., Bartorelli A.L. et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention: MACE outcomes at long-term follow-up // J Invasive Cardiol. – 2018; 30:262–268.
22. Amin A.P., Patterson M., House J.A. et al. Costs associated with access site and same-day discharge among medicare beneficiaries undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an evaluation of the current percutaneous coronary intervention care pathways in the United States // JACC Cardiovasc Interv. – 2017; 10:342–351.
23. Ariyaratne T.V., Ademi Z., Ofori-Asenso R. et al. The cost-effectiveness of guideline-driven use of drug-eluting stents: propensity-score matched analysis of a seven-year multicentre experience // Curr Med Res Opin. – 2020; 36:419–426.
