Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
In the percutaneous coronary interventions various methods of treatment of the patients with coronary heart disease are used. The principal method is radial access owing to its advantage as compared with other ones in reducing complications and mortality. The article analyses economic efficiency of the radial access in the percutaneous coronary interventions in the federal districts of the Russian Federation.
access to radiotherapy, complications, radial artery occlusion, coronary heart disease, percutaneous coronary intervention, simulation, economic analysis, clinical and economic analysis, analysis of healthcare technologies
1. Klinicheskie rekomendacii. Ostryy koronarnyy sindrom bez pod'ema segmenta ST elektrokardiogrammy. – 2020 Ministerstvo zdravoohraneniya Rossiyskoy Federacii. https: //cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/schema/154_3
2. Byrne R.A., Rossello X., Coughlan J.J., Barbato E., Berry C., Chieffo A., Claeys M.J., Dan G.A., Dweck M.R., Galbraith M., Gilard M., Hinterbuchner L., Jankowska E.A., Jüni P., Kimura T., Kunadian V., Leosdottir M., Lorusso R., Pedretti R.F.E., Rigopoulos A.G., Rubini Gimenez M., Thiele H., Vranckx P., Wassmann S., Wenger N.K., Ibanez B. 2023 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes // Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. – 2024 Feb 9; 13(1):55-161. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjacc/zuad107
3. Kolkailah A.A., Alreshq R.S., Muhammed A.M., Zahran M.E., Anas El-Wegoud M., Nabhan A.F. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with coronary artery disease // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. – 2018; 4:Cd012318.
4. Lefkovits J., Brennan A., Dinh D.T. et al. The Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry Annual Report 2018 // Monash University, SPHPM. August 2018, Report N 6
5. Brooks M., Ellis C., Gamble G. et al. A comparison of radial and femoral coronary angiography in patients from SNAPSHOT ACS, a prospective acute coronary syndrome audit in Australia and New Zealand // Heart Lung Circ. – 2017; 26:258-267.
6. Mamas M.A., Tosh J., Hulme W. et al. Health economic analysis of access site practice in england during changes in practice: insights from the british cardiovascular interventional society // Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. – 2018; 11:e004482.
7. Asrar Ul Haq M, Tsay IM, Dinh DT, et al. Prevalence and outcomes of trans-radial access for percutaneous coronary intervention in contemporary practice // Int J Cardiol. – 2016; 221:264–268.
8. Kolkailah A.A., Alreshq R.S., Muhammed A.M., Zahran M.E., Anas El-Wegoud M., Nabhan A.F. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with coronary artery disease // Cochrane Database Syst Rev. – 2018; 4:Cd012318.
9. Mamas M.A., Tosh J., Hulme W. et al. Health economic analysis of access site practice in england during changes in practice: insights from the british cardiovascular interventional society // Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. – 2018; 11:e004482.
10. Lee P., Liew D., Brennan A. et al. Cost-effectiveness of radial access percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome // Am J Cardiol. – 2021; 156:44–51.
11. Lefkovits J., Brennan A., Dinh D.T. et al. The Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry Annual Report 2018 Monash University, SPHPM August 2018, Report N 6
12. Ognerubov D.V., Sedaghat A., Provatorov S.I., Tereshchenko A.S., Bertrand O.F., Bernat I., Arutyunyan G.K., Pogorelova O.A., Tripoten M.I., Balakhonova. T.V. et al. A Randomized Trial Comparing Short versus Prolonged Hemostasis with Rescue Recanalization by Ipsilateral Ulnar Artery Compression: Impact on Radial Artery Occlusion – The RESCUE-RAO Trial // J. Interv. Cardiol. – 2020; 2020: 7928961 Doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/7928961
13. Stub D., Lefkovits J., Brennan A.L. et al. The establishment of the Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry (VCOR): monitoring and optimising outcomes for cardiac patients in Victoria // Heart Lung Circ. – 2018; 27:451–463.
14. Lefkovits J., Brennan A., Dinh D.T. et al. 2017 The Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry Annual Report // Monash University, SPHPM August 2018, Report N 5
15. Kwok C.S., Shah B., Al-Suwaidi J., Fischman D.L., Holmvang L., Alraies C., Bagur R., Nagaraja V., Rashid M., Mohamed M., Martin G.P., Kontopantelis E., Kinnaird T., Mamas M. Timing and Causes of Unplanned Readmissions After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the Nationwide Readmission Database / JACC Cardiovasc nterv. – 2019 Apr 22; 12(8):734-748. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2019.02.007
16. Alekyan B.G., Grigor'yan A.M., Staferov A.V., Karapetyan N.G. Rentgenendovaskulyarnaya diagnostika i lechenie zabolevaniy serdca i sosudov v Rossiyskoy Federacii – 2021 god // Endovaskulyarnaya hirurgiya. – 2022; 9 (Special'nyy vypusk): S5–S254. Doi:https://doi.org/10.24183/2409-4080- 2022-9S-S5-S254
17. Rossiya – VVP na dushu naseleniya. [https: //ru.tradingeconomics.com/russia/gdp-per-capita. Data obrascheniya 17.05.2024.
18. Ocsan R.J., Doost A., Marley P., Farshid A. The rise of transradial artery access for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes in Australia // J Interv Cardiol. – 2020; 2020:4397697.
19. Lee P, Liew D, Brennan A. et al. Cost-effectiveness of radial access percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome // Am J Cardiol. – 2021; 156:44–51.
20. Jin C., Li W., Qiao S.B. et al. Costs and benefits associated with transradial versus transfemoral percutaneous coronary intervention in China // J Am Heart Assoc. – 2016; 5:e002684.
21. Campelo-Parada F., Carrié D., Bartorelli A.L. et al. Radial versus femoral approach for percutaneous coronary intervention: MACE outcomes at long-term follow-up // J Invasive Cardiol. – 2018; 30:262–268.
22. Amin A.P., Patterson M., House J.A. et al. Costs associated with access site and same-day discharge among medicare beneficiaries undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an evaluation of the current percutaneous coronary intervention care pathways in the United States // JACC Cardiovasc Interv. – 2017; 10:342–351.
23. Ariyaratne T.V., Ademi Z., Ofori-Asenso R. et al. The cost-effectiveness of guideline-driven use of drug-eluting stents: propensity-score matched analysis of a seven-year multicentre experience // Curr Med Res Opin. – 2020; 36:419–426.
