Moscow, Moscow, Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Distraction osteogenesis of the lower jaw is widely used for the children with congenital or acquired forms of underdevelopment of the lower jaw, allowing gradual lengthening of the bone and improving of the mandibular functions. The treatment is increasingly planned with the use of 3D modelling, which improves precision of the osteotomies and distractor installing. However, in clinical practice minor discrepancies between the calculated (planned) and actually achieved lengthening of the jaw are possible because of Oral and maxillofacial surger Virtual the soft tissues elasticity, reaction of the regenerate and other factors. That is why this work deals with assessing of the degree of compliance of the pre-surgical 3D computer planning of distraction osteogenesis of the lower jaw in children.
lower jaw, distraction osteogenesis, 3D planning, precision, children, retrospective study
1. Anehosur V.M., Monis P.L., Nagaraj N.M., Krishnamurthy K.M., Shettigar P., Patil A.M. Role of Distraction Osteogenesis in the Management of Post-ankylotic Deformity // Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. – 2022; 33(8):2493–2498. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000008749
2. Rachmiel A., Capucha T., Ginini J., Shilo D., Emodi O., Vered I. Treatment of Facial Asymmetry Using Distraction Osteogenesis in a Mandible-First Approach // Journal of Clinical Medicine. – 2023; 12(18):5774. Doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12185774
3. Chen K., Xiao D., Abotaleb B., Chen H., Li Y., Zhu S. Accuracy of Virtual Surgical Planning in Treatment of TMJ Ankylosis Using Distraction Osteogenesis: Comparison of Planned and Actual Results // Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. – 2018; 76(11):2422.e1–2422.e20. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.07.003
4. Villamil V., Martínez-Padilla I., Ayats-Soler M., Parri-Ferrandis F.J., Bejarano-Serrano M., Riba-Martínez M., Rubio-Palau J. Accuracy of Virtually Planned Mandibular Distraction in a Pediatric Case Series // Journal of Craniomaxillofacial Surgery. – 2021; 49(2):154–165. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2020.12.012
5. Bastidas N., Bartlett S.P. Optimization of Curvilinear Mandible Distraction Using Three-Dimensional Computer-Simulated Modeling // Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. – 2012; 23(6):1713–1716. Doihttps://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31826bee92
6. Chung C.U., Yu J.W., Bastidas N., Bartlett S.P., Taylor J.A. Utility of the Ultrasonic Scalpel in Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis // Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. – 2012; 23(5):1279–1282.https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31825196b4
7. Lewis M., Lewis P., Nguyen T., Rea A., Goonewardene M.S., Tong H. Skeletal Stability of Inter-molar Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis in Growing Patients // Progress in Orthodontics. – 2024; 25(1):8. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-023-00507-x
8. Hu K.G., Warburton R., Alpert B. Computerized Surgical Planning for Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis // Seminars in Plastic Surgery. 2024;38(3):234–241. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1786757
9. Earley M., Troulis M.J. Update on Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis // Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery. – 2014; 22(4):261–267. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0000000000000067 10 Resnick C.M. Precise Osteotomies for Mandibular Distraction in Infants with Robin Sequence Using Virtual Surgical Planning // International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. – 2018; 47(1):35–43. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2017.07.020
10. Troulis M.J., Kaban L.B. Complications of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis // Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinics of North America. – 2003; 15(2):251–264. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S1042- 3699(02)00101-2
11. Verlinden C.R.A., van de Vijfeijken S.E.C.M., Tuinzing D.B., Jansma E.P., Becking A.G., Swennen G.R.J. Complications of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis for Developmental Deformities: A Systematic Review // International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. – 2015;44(1):44–49. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2014.09.007
12. Master D.L., Hanson P.R., Gosain A.K. Complications of Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis // Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. – 2010; 21(5):1565–1570. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181f3c0b0
13. Fu R., Wen J., Zhai C., Yang X., Zhou Y., Zhang Y., Sun J., Zhang H. Enhancing the Efficiency of Distraction Osteogenesis Through Mechanical Modulation: Recent Advances and Future Directions // Bioactive Materials. – 2021; 6(11):3841–3855. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.04.02015 Ilizarov G.A. The Tension-Stress Effect on the Genesis and Growth of Tissues. Part II: The Influence of the Rate and Frequency of Distraction // Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. – 1989; 239:263–285.
14. Aronson J. Experimental and Clinical Experience with Distraction Osteogenesis // Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. – 1994; 301:47–61.
15. Bafor A., Wallace C.G., Yeh C.H., Lin C.H., Chen H.C. The Evolution of Virtual Surgical Planning in Craniofacial Surgery: From Planning to Execution // Annals of Plastic Surgery. – 2020; 85(4S Suppl 3):S219–S225. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002473
16. Wallace C.G., Chang Y.M., Tsai C.Y., Hsu Y.M., Chen Y.R. Evolution of Orthognathic Surgery in the Era of Virtual Surgical Planning: A Review // Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. – 2008; 107(11):761–768. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60016-0
17. Imsheneckaya N.I. Personificirovannyy kompleksnyy podhod k diagnostike i lecheniyu detey i podrostkov s kraniofacial'noy mikrosomiey / dis. … d-ra med. nauk. – M. – FGBOU VO «MGMSU im. A. I. Evdokimova» Minzdrava Rossii, 2025 – 320 s.
18. Lezhnev D.A., Imsheneckaya N.I., Sheyfer V.A., Egorova E.A. Osobennosti magnitno-rezonansnoytomografii visochno-nizhnechelyustnogo sustava u detey // Medicinskiy vestnik MVD. – 2024;131(4):72–76. Doi:https://doi.org/10.52341/20738080_2024_131_4_72
